Newsflash


WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama sees both "unprecedented consensus" from outside Congress on his drive to remake the nation's health care system and obstructionism by some on Capitol Hill.

FILE - In this Oct. 5, 2009, file photo President Barack Obama shakes hands with doctors after making remarks on health care reform in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington. "The historic movement to bring real, meaningful health insurance reform to the American people gathered momentum this week as we approach the final days of this debate," Obama said Saturday, Oct. 10, 2009, in his weekly radio and video address. (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert, file)
FILE - In this Oct. 5, 2009, file photo President Barack Obama shakes hands with doctors after making remarks on health care reform in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington. "The historic movement to bring real, meaningful health insurance reform to the American people gathered momentum this week as we approach the final days of this debate," Obama said Saturday, Oct. 10, 2009, in his weekly radio and video address. (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert, file) (Gerald Herbert - AP)

 

"The historic movement to bring real, meaningful health insurance reform to the American people gathered momentum this week as we approach the final days of this debate," Obama said Saturday in his weekly radio and Internet video address.

The consensus "includes everyone from doctors and nurses to hospitals and drug manufacturers" - even Republican governors and former GOP lawmakers, Obama said.

It does not extend to congressional Republicans, however, as nearly all of them oppose the Democrats' health care proposals.

The president noted that California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, former Senate Majority Leaders Bob Dole and Bill Frist, all Republicans, and former Health and Human Service chiefs Louis Sullivan and Tommy Thompson, who both served in Republican administrations, have all come out in favor of overhauling health care, even though they differ on some specifics.

"These distinguished leaders understand that health insurance reform isn't a Democratic issue or a Republican issue, but an American issue that demands a solution," Obama said.

ad_icon
if ( show_doubleclick_ad && ( adTemplate & INLINE_ARTICLE_AD ) == INLINE_ARTICLE_AD && inlineAdGraf ) { placeAd('ARTICLE',commercialNode,20,'inline=y;',true) ; }

Democrats have made significant strides since Labor Day, when they returned to the Capitol after an August spent absorbing attacks from noisy conservative critics over health care.

A health care bill soon to emerge from the Senate Finance Committee is the only one judged to meet Obama's conditions for expanding insurance coverage without raising the federal deficit, while also slowing the rise in medical costs.

Yet Obama said he recognized the issue remains divisive among members of Congress.

"There are some in Washington today who seem determined to play the same old partisan politics, working to score political points, even if it means burdening this country with an unsustainable status quo," Obama said. That "status quo" includes rising health care costs, diminishing coverage and arbitrary decisions by big insurance companies, he said.

Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell differs with Obama's views on cooperation.

"I've spoken about reform 44 times on the Senate floor on the need for health care reform," McConnell said. "But higher premiums, higher taxes, and more government? That's not reform. And this is precisely the problem Americans have identified with advocates of the administration's health care plans."

In the the Republican radio address, Sen. George LeMieux of Florida acknowledged deep problems with the health care system, but cautioned "the solution should not be worse than the problem we are trying to solve."

"We in the Congress have a duty to tackle this problem, but the solution we settle upon should not be rushed," LeMieux said in the GOP's weekly address. Democrats maintain Republicans are simply trying to delay action.

LeMieux said the Democrats' approach would:

-cost $1.8 trillion over 10 years, more than twice the total for the Senate Finance Committee's bill, as projected by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.

-add a new tax burden by penalizing those who do not buy health insurance.

-deny millions of people the choice of health plans that best suit their needs by forcing them onto Medicaid.

-take about $500 billion out of Medicare.

"Taking money from a program already in financial trouble is not responsible," LeMieux said. "It's not fair to our seniors who paid into the program, and it's not fair to our children and grandchildren who will be burdened with massive debt obligations."

 



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! JoomlaVote! Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! Yahoo! Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!
 

Content Calendar

<< July ’10 >>
Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su
   
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
 

YouTubes OnBlass

Advertisement Images

investigations logo.jpg
powered_by.png, 1 kB
Home arrow Blog arrow Iraq car bombings kill 147
Iraq car bombings kill 147 PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest 
Sunday, 25 October 2009

Assailants strike just outside the Green Zone, near the Justice Ministry and the Baghdad provincial council building. Shocked Iraqis, blaming politicians, fear more violence as Jan. 16 election nears.

 Reporting from Bagdad - Twin suicide bombings in the heart of a busy section of downtown Baghdad killed 147 people Sunday in an apparent attempt to undermine Prime Minister Nouri Maliki's government at a time of rising political tensions over crucial national elections due in January.

The attacks outside the Justice Ministry and the Baghdad provincial council headquarters injured an additional 700 people. They were the deadliest bombings in Iraq in more than two years.

The midmorning explosions, in a closely guarded area packed with government buildings, served as a fresh reminder that although U.S. attention has shifted in large part to Afghanistan, Iraq remains a highly volatile place. Some fear it could disintegrate into chaos again even before U.S. forces finish their planned departure.

The car bombings, which occurred within minutes of each nother, also indicated that militants appear to have the capacity to strike at will against key targets, despite repeated claims of progress by Iraqi security forces, which have been in charge since U.S. troops withdrew from Iraqi cities in June.

The explosions ripped through traffic and buildings a block apart on a busy workday, hurling vehicles through the air, incinerating drivers and burning office workers at their desks. Blast walls erected for protection were pulverized. Mangled bodies and pieces of flesh lay strewn around the streets. Water spewed from a destroyed mains and collected in blood-tinged pools.

The mayhem was reminiscent of a pair of similarly devastating attacks on Aug. 19 against the Foreign and Finance ministries in which more than 100 people died, but Baghdad had been relatively calm since then, prompting some government officials to boast that Iraqi security forces were now firmly in control.

The new attacks come as Iraqi political leaders face a deadlock over a new law to regulate the election scheduled to be held Jan. 16. Many Iraqis felt it was no accident that violence returned to their streets at a time when their politicians are at odds.

Election officials have warned that if there is no agreement soon, they may have to delay the vote, which could also delay the planned withdrawal of U.S. troops, scheduled to take place after the polling. At a meeting Sunday evening aimed at breaking the election law deadlock, no agreement was reached on the thorny question of how to organize voting in the disputed province of Tamim, home to the much-coveted, oil-rich city of Kirkuk.

Prime Minister Maliki visited the site of the bombings and accused remnants of Saddam Hussein's Baathist regime and the militant group Al Qaeda in Iraq of seeking to "create chaos in the country, derail the political process and prevent the parliamentary elections," according to a statement from his office. He vowed that the elections would be held on schedule.

It is Maliki who stands to lose the most from a security breakdown, because he is campaigning on his record as the leader who helped restore a good measure of security after the sectarian warfare that raged after the U.S.-led invasion. Overall, violence is down 90% since the peak in 2006, U.S. commanders say.

A resumption of violence could also force President Obama to reconsider his promises to withdraw U.S. troops. In Washington, Obama issued a strongly worded statement condemning "these outrageous attacks on the Iraqi people."

"The United States will stand with Iraq's people and government as a close friend and partner as Iraqis prepare for elections early next year, continue to take responsibility for their future and build greater peace and opportunity," he said.

U.S. and Iraqi officials have repeatedly warned that violence is likely to escalate as the election approaches; to prevent it from taking place or to attempt to influence the outcome.

Maliki and his government laid most of the blame for the August bombings on Syria, which it has accused of harboring former Baathists. President Jalal Talabani repeated the accusation in a statement after Sunday's bombings, saying that "the neighboring and distant countries should immediately refrain forever from harboring, financing and facilitating the forces that openly proclaim their hostility to the Iraqi state and its institutions."

U.S. officials, however, say they suspect most of the suicide bombings still taking place, including August's attacks, are the work of Al Qaeda in Iraq, which has been severely weakened over the last two years but retains a stubbornly persistent presence in several cities.

Many Iraqis at the scene blamed the political discord for the latest attacks, suggesting mainstream parties may be engaging in acts of violence to undermine their enemies and pointing to widespread disillusionment with the political process.

"It's the political parties," said engineer Nasreddin Latif Abdullah, 35, who was thrown to the ground at a nearby restaurant when the explosions went off. "We have these bombings whenever our leaders don't agree. They are competing for seats in government."

"A thousand blessings upon the name of Saddam Hussein," he added. "Under Saddam we had many wars, but we never saw such things in Baghdad."

Whether a more violence would prompt a significant delay in the departure of U.S. troops is in question. Current plans call for the 120,000 U.S. troops to begin a rapid drawdown about one to two months after the election. After August 2010, the deadline set by Obama for the departure of all U.S. combat forces, a force of roughly 50,000 troops, mostly logisticians and trainers, would remain until the end of 2011, by when all U.S. troops must leave under the terms of the U.S.-Iraqi security pact.

A delay in the election might force a delay in the withdrawal of combat forces, Michele Flournoy, undersecretary of Defense for policy, testified at a congressional hearing last week. But elections are unlikely to be delayed by more than a few months, if at all, and the security pact stipulates that combat troops must be gone from Iraq by the end of 2010.

Both Iraq and the U.S. insist that the agreement must be respected. And U.S. troops are already playing a diminishing role. They have withdrawn from cities, and many of those who were active on the streets of Baghdad this year are now sitting idly in their bases.

A team of U.S. soldiers wearing Explosives Ordinance Disposal armbands turned up at the site of the bombings and began wading through knee-deep water unleashed by the burst water mains, salvaging engine parts suspected to have come from the car bombs and depositing them into sealed plastic bags. The Iraqi authorities requested help with forensics, because that is a skill they still lack, a U.S. military spokesman said.

The bombings also called into question the overall capacity of the Iraqi security forces, who took control of Baghdad from U.S. forces in June amid much fanfare and expressions of national pride. The attacks occurred just a few hundred yards from the site of the Foreign Ministry bombing in August and extra security precautions had been ordered in the area, which houses many government institutions.

The Baghdad provincial council office is located on a block off-limits to normal traffic, with checkpoints at either end, and the Justice Ministry is just beyond it. Yet somehow two suicide bombers managed to reach their destinations.

"This is the question we are asking," said Mahmoud Nabil, 36, who witnessed the bombings from his office located between the two buildings. "There are checkpoints here searching everyone, so how could this have happened?"



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! JoomlaVote! Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! Yahoo! Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!
 
< Prev   Next >

OnBlass Weather

Philadelphia, PA
Thunderstorms Likely, Probability Of Precipitation: 60% Today: Thunderstorms Likely
92°F | 65°F
Mostly Sunny Tomorrow: Mostly Sunny
87°F | 63°F
Current Conditions:
The most current observation is more than 17675 hours old, please try again later.
Dallas, Tx
Isolated Thunderstorms Today: Isolated Thunderstorms
94°F | 74°F
Hot Tomorrow: Hot
100°F | 75°F
Current Conditions:
The most current observation is more than 17675 hours old, please try again later.
Martinsburg, WV
Thunderstorms, Probability Of Precipitation: 60% Today: Thunderstorms
90°F | 62°F
Mostly Sunny Tomorrow: Mostly Sunny
86°F | 56°F
Current Conditions:
The most current observation is more than 17675 hours old, please try again later.
Los Angeles, CA
Increasing Clouds Today: Increasing Clouds
77°F | 63°F
Partly Sunny Tomorrow: Partly Sunny
78°F | 63°F
Current Conditions:
The most current observation is more than 18468 hours old, please try again later.
OnBlass Weather
© 2010 Onblass.com News1 - Your Consolidated News Source
Global Technology Solutions Inc! Proving Solutions to your technical challenges.