Newsflash


Staring into the abyss always focuses the mind, which can help you avoid falling in. So let's take a look at the potential catastrophe that awaits us once we survive our current crisis.

At the dawn of the 21st century the U.S. had $5.7 trillion in total debt. As we approach the end of George W. Bush's presidency only eight years later, that sum has nearly doubled, thanks to war costs, tax cuts, spending increases, expanded entitlement programs, and now a welter of government bailouts and rescues.

This year was particularly bad. The federal budget deficit for fiscal 2008 hit $455 billion, up from $162 billion last year. That figure does not include the cost of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, which has an initial pricetag in the hundreds of billions of dollars. In fairness, some of that money presumably will come back to the Treasury, since the new rescue-related sums will be used to acquire preferred stock, mortgages, and other assets that someday could be sold at a profit.

Yet any such calculations are penny ante compared with the fiscal disaster that is bearing down on America. It's no longer an event in the misty future. It officially began earlier this year when teacher Kathleen Casey-Kirschling of Maryland became the first baby-boom retiree to collect Social Security benefits. She will be followed by about 78 million more boomers over the next 17 years.

The entitlements due from Social Security and Medicare present us with that frightening abyss. The costs of these current programs, along with other health-care costs, could bankrupt our country. The abyss offers no assets, troubled or otherwise, to help us cross it.

Yes, some have suggested less-than-revolutionary measures that could help. Among them: budget savings that would accrue from repealing the Bush-era tax cuts, ending the Iraq war, or expanding the economy after the current downturn runs its course. But even if the economy were to grow at the level of 3.2% a year, as it did in the 1990s, and these other savings were achieved, they wouldn't come close to addressing our federal financial problem.

Nor can we be complacent about timing. The costs of these programs start to threaten our solvency in the next several years. The only way to get across the chasm is to begin making tough choices now to change our current course. Delay will make the problem worse.

In fact, the deteriorating financial condition of our federal government in the face of skyrocketing health-care costs and the baby-boom retirement could fairly be described as a super-subprime crisis. It would certainly dwarf what we're seeing now.

The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO), noting that the federal balance sheet does not reflect the government's huge unfunded promises in our nation's social-insurance programs, estimated last year that the unfunded obligations for Medicare and Social Security alone totaled almost $41 trillion. That sum, equivalent to $352,000 per U.S. household, is the present-value shortfall between the growing cost of entitlements and the dedicated revenues intended to pay for them over the next 75 years.

Why call it a super-subprime crisis? Besides its gigantic scale, there are very disturbing similarities between the current mortgage-related crisis and our next potential disaster.

First, like the securitized investment vehicles that blew up, federal programs were launched without adequately thinking through who would bear the ultimate cost and related risk. Just as originators of mortgages let themselves off the hook by unloading packages of dubious loans onto others, lawmakers have increased spending, expanded entitlement programs, and cut taxes while expecting future generations to pay the bill.

Second, just as a lack of transparency associated with mortgage-backed securities resulted in big surprises and large losses for investors, our nation's huge off-balance-sheet obligations for Social Security and Medicare present a threat wrapped in camouflage. After all, the government's "trust funds" don't really provide much security since they don't hold anything but more government debt.

Third, in the same way that private sector "risk management" executives failed to prevent the subprime mortgage crisis, overseers in Congress and the executive branch have turned a blind eye to costs associated with entitlement programs and tax cuts. While lax regulation of banks fed the current subprime crisis, a lack of statutory budget controls has led to a widening gap between the government's revenues and costs.

At the heart of these problems is our leaders' collective failure to act in the face of known challenges. Our country has veered from its founding principles, which held to individual responsibility and accountability today in order to create more opportunity tomorrow. When our constitution was written, the concepts of thrift and prudence were no less at the center of the American spirit than liberty and justice.



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! JoomlaVote! Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! Yahoo! Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!
 

Content Calendar

<< January ’09 >>
Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su
   
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
 

YouTubes OnBlass

Advertisement Images

onblasslogo.jpg

Featured Articles

Joomla Featured Articles Module by DART Creations
powered_by.png, 1 kB
Home arrow Blog arrow Iraqi party says it will not support US pact
Iraqi party says it will not support US pact PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest 
Thursday, 20 November 2008

Iraqi party says it will not support US pact

Regional News

Iraqi party says it will not support US pact

Published Date: November 20, 2008

BAGHDAD: A small Shiite party said yesterday that a US-Iraqi security pact allowing American troops to stay in Iraq for three more years infringes on Iraqi sovereignty, and vowed to vote against the deal in parliament.

Even without the support of the Fadhila party's 15 lawmakers, the agreement is likely to be approved when the 275-seat parliament votes Nov. 24. The political parties that comprise Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's ruling coalition dominate the legislature, and his Cabinet approved the deal with Washington on Sunday.

The complaints of the Fadhila party, however, reflect unease among some Iraqis about a continuing US presence in their country after years of war, even if a clear timetable for their withdrawal is laid out in the deal. The largely Basra-based Fadhila party complained that it had not been kept informed of developments during months of negotiations.

It also cited alleged ambiguities in the agreement and questioned the commitment of the United States to help rid Iraq of billions of dollars it owes in loans dating from the rule of dictator Saddam Hussein. The party has been at odds with parliament's main Shiite bloc, which it quit last year to protest its alleged exclusion from policy decisions.

We cannot vote in favor of the security agreement," said Hassan al-Shimari, a senior Fadhila lawmaker. Another group, the bloc loyal to Shiite leader Muqtada al-Sadr, opposes the agreement. It has about 30 seats in parliament, which was due to have a second reading of the security agreement later yesterday in the run-up to the vote.

Al-Maliki went on national television Tuesday to defend the agreement. He acknowledged that he had "reservations" on the pact, but said it paved the way for the restoration of Iraq's full sovereignty after the last US soldier leaves Iraq at the end of 2011.

If the agreement is approved by parliament, it will then go to the president and his two deputies for ratification. Each one of them - President Jalal Talabani and vice presidents Adel Abdul-Mahdi and Tariq al-Hashemi - has the power to veto the agreement.

Also yesterday, the US military said Iraqi security forces arrested an alleged senior member of Iran's elite security forces suspected of funneling arms into Iraq. It said police detained the man, who authorities allege is a member of the Revolutionary Guards' elite Quds force from Iran, at Baghdad International Airport on Tuesday while he was trying to leave the country.

The suspect was working for an organization allegedly tied to the Quds force that uses the construction and repair of religious sites in Iraq as cover to funnel arms into the country "in legitimate shipments of building materials," the military said. The US said the arms were destined for an extremist group in Iraq. Washington has accused Iran of training and arming Shiite extremist groups in Iraq and fueling the insurgency. Tehran denies the charges.

The arrest follows Iran's surprisingly positive position on the US-Iraqi security pact, which it had bitterly opposed. The apparent shift in policy could reflect their recognition that the agreement contains a firm timetable for American withdrawal, as well as Tehran's hopes for better relations with the United States after President-elect Barack Obama takes office in January. At the insistence of Iraq, where most Shiite leaders have strong ties to Iran, the agreement prohibits the Americans from using Ir
aq to launch attacks against its neighbors, like longtime US adversaries Iran and Syria. -- AP


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! JoomlaVote! Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! Yahoo! Free social bookmarking plugins and extensions for Joomla! websites!
 
< Prev   Next >

OnBlass Weather

Dallas, Tx
Slight Chance Rain, Probability Of Precipitation: 70% Tomorrow: Slight Chance Rain
57°F | 36°F
Mostly Sunny Wednesday: Mostly Sunny
64°F | 37°F
Current Conditions:
The most current observation is more than 4007 hours old, please try again later.
Los Angeles, CA
Mostly Sunny Tomorrow: Mostly Sunny
64°F | 51°F
Mostly Sunny Wednesday: Mostly Sunny
69°F | 51°F
Current Conditions:
The most current observation is more than 4800 hours old, please try again later.
OnBlass Weather
© 2009 Onblass.com News1 - Your Consolidated News Source
Global Technology Solutions Inc! Proving Solutions to your technical challenges.